Help talk:Consensus checks
From Heroes Wiki
Notes
Some notes for things this page should include. Feel free to add. :) — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 20:31, 26 April 2009 (EDT)
-
Names shouldn't be opposed based on another name being better. -
Possessor names shouldn't be opposed. They shouldn't even be part of the consensus check. -
Opposition should be based on validity and not on personal preference. - If two or more names remain, and there is a clear favorite, that's the name that gets chosen. If there's no clear favorite, a traditional vote can be held.
- How does this work for character names and the like? (We usually don't have issues with anything but power names...why is that?)
- See Heroes Wiki talk:Community Portal#Consensus checks.
- See User talk:Ryangibsonstewart#consensus checks
-
Names can be crossed out when there is legitimate opposition. - Formalize where discussions should go...
- Anything else? :) — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 20:31, 26 April 2009 (EDT)
- What happens if someone gives a legitimate opposition to a name, but another person also gives a legitimate counterargument to the opposition?—Referos 09:44, 12 December 2009 (EST)

