Talk:Petrelli rings
From Heroes Wiki
More generic
I think this article would be better off being called "Petrelli rings", to show the history of Angela's ring, Nathan's ring, and Arthur's ring. — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 20:59, 22 November 2008 (EST)
- Ah right, I forgot Angela and Nathan had rings too. In that case, sure, why not? Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ U | T | C ] 22:22, 22 November 2008 (EST)
- I figure that way it could get some more traffic and not get buried with all the other items that appear once or twice. — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 22:26, 22 November 2008 (EST)
- Agreed, the name change would be great.—Alen76 17:29, 16 February 2009 (EST)
- Considering that we have consensus here, I'm going to go ahead and make the change. Then we've just got to add the other rings in.—Steely McBeam - (talk) 12:33, 11 March 2009 (EDT)
- Agreed, the name change would be great.—Alen76 17:29, 16 February 2009 (EST)
- I figure that way it could get some more traffic and not get buried with all the other items that appear once or twice. — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 22:26, 22 November 2008 (EST)
Hey just a quick question on two things. First of all, should we list Heidi's ring, considering she was a part of the Petrelli family? Secondly does Peter ever wear a ring?—Steely McBeam - (talk) 13:17, 11 March 2009 (EDT)
- I don't really think Heidi should be listed, more of a blood-related Petrelli thing I would say
- It's more connected to Nathan's ring than the others are. Why just the Petrellis in the first place? - Josh (talk/contribs) 13:26, 11 March 2009 (EDT)
- Well because they are a family and they do have rings, which have had a lot of appearances. It's pretty much the same question as why there are separate pages for Claire's necklace and the Symbol necklace. —Steely McBeam - (talk) 13:32, 11 March 2009 (EDT)
- It's more connected to Nathan's ring than the others are. Why just the Petrellis in the first place? - Josh (talk/contribs) 13:26, 11 March 2009 (EDT)

