Talk:Pokémon

From Heroes Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Doesn't "Pikachu" have an accent in there somewhere? -- Tristan0709 talk 02:42, 4 January 2009 (EST)

  • Nope. Pokémon does, but pikachu just uses regular lettering. --Piemanmoo 02:44, 4 January 2009 (EST)
    • If you sneeze the word, you could say "pikachú". :) -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 03:30, 4 January 2009 (EST)

omg

IceGhost78 this page rocks

Title

This article seems more about Pokémon in general, rather than just Pikachu. Perhaps we should rename it?--MiamiVolts 23:28, 15 February 2010 (EST)

  • Good idea. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 00:04, 16 February 2010 (EST)
    • How is the article more about Pokemon in general? The only references are to Pikachu.--Riddler 02:48, 16 February 2010 (EST)
      • In the Trial of the Black Bear and the The Trip, Part 1, there are characters that are shaped similarly to a Pokémon character, but don't look like Pikachu. Also, the reference saying "Chuffa! Chuffa!" is similar to Pikachu's "Pika! Pika!", but it's not a direct reference. I'm not opposed to keeping the title Pikachu, just think Pokémon would work better.--MiamiVolts (talk) 03:07, 16 February 2010 (EST)
        • Agree. Also, the character from The Trip, Part 1 is not Pikachu, but a generic Pokémon type character. Pokémon redirects here. I don't see why we wouldn't change the article to be more general. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 16:42, 16 February 2010 (EST)
          • Eh, the one in The Trip seems to be like a stretch to me. I don't see any Pokemon looking characters in the image, just generic creatures. I could say that that's a Digimon or a monster from World of Warcraft. I don't think that one even belongs on the page. As for the ChuffaChuffa and Pokemon similarity for the Trial, that wasn't direct enough to warrant it's own section, so it's in the notes. All the other references are actually about Pikachu.--Riddler 03:28, 17 February 2010 (EST)
            • Jason Badower confirmed that he was referencing Pokemon. Heroes Interactive also compared Hiro to a Pokemon character. The only reason the notes were used is because the article is named "Pikachu" and not "Pokemon". Had it been named "Pokemon", there wouldn't even be a discussion. I see no reason not to name the article "Pokemon" and make the article more general. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 10:39, 17 February 2010 (EST)