Theory talk:Paul E. Sylar

From Heroes Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

Although I love the third theory here, why are you keeping a theory page for a non-canon character? Image:Green.gif AltesUTC CH

This needs to go.—PJDEP - Talk - Polls and Opinions 23:55, 28 February 2010 (EST)

  • Seriously, there's no point in keeping this and no one has advocated for it.—PJDEP - Talk - Polls and Opinions 12:35, 18 April 2010 (EDT)
    • I'll try calling admin attention. Intuitive Empath - Talk - Contributions 13:07, 18 April 2010 (EDT)
      • The first two theories are valid. It doesn't matter whether or not this is a canon or non-canon character. Ultimately, I haven't seen a good reason for deleting it. If all the theories are either proven or disproven, we can delete the page. — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 14:25, 18 April 2010 (EDT)
        • I don't understand. I could just as easily say that Fred Smith is the creator of the Sylar Watch, but that theory wouldn't be allowed to exist.—PJDEP - Talk - Polls and Opinions 16:27, 18 April 2010 (EDT)
          • Who is Fred Smith? — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 19:50, 18 April 2010 (EDT)
            • He was the man who served Matt that falafel in seaso- kidding. It's a name I made up to demonstrate a point.—PJDEP - Talk - Polls and Opinions 20:25, 18 April 2010 (EDT)
              • I don't see the correlation. Paul E. Sylar appeared in a version of the pilot, and he was mentioned in an article in Chandra's apartment. He's not just a made up person. I guess I don't see the harm in a theory page about him. If there's a legitimate reason to delete the page, fine. But if the reason is just because he's primarily seen in a deleted scene, then I'm not sure that's enough of a reason. — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 22:03, 18 April 2010 (EDT)
Personal tools
Heroes Merchandise