User talk:Tristan0709

From Heroes Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

April Fools

I want to congratulate you on your "Invisible Thread" joke spoiler blurb. Using BTE (and other) spoilers makes it close to believable. It looked very professional. However, to sell it as real you should've added your blurb to the episodes spoiler page. Kudos. --Elemental Manipulator [ U | T | C ] - When in doubt, ask BTE 04:39, 1 April 2009 (EDT)

  • *takes bow* Thankyou! I was planning on doing something on Twitter, but that sort of fell on it's head, so I thought I'd do something here! Kind of scared of what will happen when someone higher up finds out about it though. :( -- Tristan0709 talk 04:48, 1 April 2009 (EDT)
    • But didn't you already tell RGS about it? --Elemental Manipulator [ U | T | C ] - When in doubt, ask BTE 05:04, 1 April 2009 (EDT)
      • Yeah, but he hasn't been on since. -- Tristan0709 talk 05:33, 1 April 2009 (EDT)
        • I hate being the spoilsport, but fake spoilers don't belong, even on April Fools' Day. We have many users from countries that don't celebrate April Fools' Day, and ultimately, it cheapens our site and makes us look unprofessional. As long as it doesn't happen again, I won't be upset. :) -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 15:29, 1 April 2009 (EDT)


Hey, Tristan. I noticed that you've been adding trivia to episode articles that read "so-and-so do not appear in this episode". I'd just like to ask how this is noteworthy; there's a bunch of other characters that do not appear in a certain episode, so how is something like "Simone Deveaux does not appear in this episode." worth adding to the trivia section? --Radicell 04:39, 4 April 2009 (EDT)

  • Only because Simone credited as 'starring' (a main character) throughout the whole season. She may die in 1x16, but she appears in 1x18 and 1x23, and is still credited as a main character. So technically, she is 'absent' from the other episodes. -- Tristan0709 talk 05:10, 4 April 2009 (EDT)
    • Then it should be made clearer, saying "so-and-so didn't appear" is hardly trivia, saying "so-and-so are credited, yet didn't appear" is, similar to "first appearance as main cast", which you've done in some. Intuitive Empath - Talk - Contributions 12:46, 9 April 2009 (EDT)
      • But they aren't credited. But in the episodes in which they are credited, they are credited as main cast. So it's trivia that a main cast member did not appear in a specific episode.-- Tristan0709 talk 02:06, 13 April 2009 (EDT)


No problem and thanks :) --posted by Laughingdevilboy Talk 04:03, 6 April 2009 (EDT)


Thank You, we're only a few months apart (I consider my real birthday to be the day I became a patroller, so we're practically brothers!) --IronyUTC CH 08:22, 8 April 2009 (EDT)

Cockney Heroes

Hi there, thank you for entering out competition your ability and character sound great! Could we ask one small thing, could you create a south park character (found here) as this will help your character fit in with Cockney Heroes. Thanks :) --posted by Laughingdevilboy Talk 16:33, 18 April 2009 (EDT)

  • Very good I like it. It looks like she is a fugitive and been involved in the plane crash, very impressive :) --posted by Laughingdevilboy

Talk 12:52, 20 April 2009 (EDT)


Hi Tristan, I saw the note on your userpage about your blog and thought I'd have a look. I, also, love lost and am looking forwards to the next ep. Anyway, I love your blog, do walkabout!!! I want to see what you think. It's great (and btw I want a Claire centric ep was well). --IronyUTC CH 13:16, 21 April 2009 (EDT)

  • Thanks! Haven't done much on that blog as of late. I felt Claire has been underused since......Raised by Another! Anyway, you've motivated me, I'll start typing up something now! :) -- Tristan0709 talk 04:08, 23 April 2009 (EDT)

Cockney Heroes Competition Results

Hi there Tristan0709, After much deliberation we (the Cockney Heroes team) would like to say you were a runner up. Your character will have a have a cameo and your ability will be in the show. --posted by Laughingdevilboy Talk 06:50, 4 May 2009 (EDT)

JoshuaKorolenko NOT AgentJordan

Hi. Thanks for the tip. Jordan not me. He is my twin brother. We don't have separate e-mail account so we have to share but we two completely different people. Joshua Korolenko

  • I'm sorry. The same age and location seemed to indicate otherwise. Again, sorry! -- Tristan0709 talk 05:36, 7 May 2009 (EDT)

Sylar's funeral

Hey Tristan, I noticed you put a rename tag on the Sylar's funeral page, but you didn't leave a reason or discussion. Doing so would be helpful for clarification. --Crazylicious 23:07, 9 May 2009 (EDT)

  • Oh. Sure. Sorry. -- Tristan0709 talk 23:22, 9 May 2009 (EDT)

GB departure

User Gabriel Bishop is considering leaving Heroes Wiki, please add your signature to this petition in an attempt to convince him to stay. User:Danko/GB'sPetition

-- By Danko CH 09:06, 27 May 2009 (EDT)

Editing Warning

Thats fine if you do not want to sign but please to not restore vile messages on my talk page after I had been granted permission to remove them. Instead please become a positively contributing member to Heroes Wiki, thank you -- By Danko CH 07:52, 31 May 2009 (EDT)

  • Danko, I think you are very out of line in your tone. Tristan is a very strong editor here on the wiki, and is one of the more "positively contributing" members here. But even if he weren't, it's really not your place to lecture him or patronize him. We do have a policy against removing archived discussions, and Tristan was simply following that policy. The policy is a little more relaxed in cases of one's own talk page, especially if the user finds the comments offensive, but Tristan really did nothing wrong. You're not in the wrong in addressing the issue, Danko, but I think your tone is unnecessarily rude...but I see you have apologized, and I appreciate that. However, I would not add "please become a positively contributing member to Heroes Wiki" to your messages anymore. It's quite patronizing. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 08:13, 2 June 2009 (EDT)


I was wrong to lecture you, I didn't realise you were a patroller, I have stopped the petitions but I do not believe I am annoying. I instead will contribute more as instructed, but when I leave an informative message to a user I often say at the end: please become a positively contributing member to Heroes Wiki, thank you as to not appear rude and offensive. I take it that is offensive to you. -- By Danko CH 11:28, 1 June 2009 (EDT)

Also I read your comments on User talk:Cockney Heroes‎ so do you or do you not have a negative feeling towards me? -- By Danko CH 12:05, 1 June 2009 (EDT)

Cockney Heroes Competition Two

As you may know, a group of Heroes-Wiki-Users are writing a fan fiction called. We are happy to announce a second Cockney Heroes competition. In this competition you will have to create a character and an ability. If you have not been reading Cockney Heroes, a portal of all of the episodes are here and there is a series similar to the graphic novels for Cockney Heroes, here. We would like you to try out as we think that you would be a great inspiration for the team :) Thank You, we hope very much that you will enter If you need to know anything see here, we will try to respond as soon as possible. --IronyUTC CH 16:48, 29 June 2009 (EDT)

Gulp-Ninja Contest

I have a story line going on (see here) and I have a contest going. You are eligible to enter a character into the story and have a chance to win and have your character in the story line. There are rules and an entry board here so let me know if you would like to join! --Iheartheroes 17:32, 25 August 2009 (EDT)


So, can someone submit their own synopsis from another site here. I'm certainly glad to provide whatever evidence is necessary to prove I own the copyright. Alternately, how many minor changes to I need to make to my own work to publish it here? --Gadfly 03:24, 24 September 2009 (EDT)


Hi, my name is IHH and I don't know if you have noticed or not, but I recently did some edits to two of your pages(Cast changes 3 and Regular appearances). I was hoping that it was okay for me to do this and if I did it all correctly..So, can you tell me whether I am okay in doing this and/or if I did them correctly. Thanks! ~~IHHTalk 20:51, 30 September 2009 (EDT)

  • Hi! Yeah, I don't mind if you go ahead and change pages like that! I think what you've done is fine, I might make a few changes to the second page you linked to if you don't mind, I'll try to think of a way to say what you've said that looks a bit less...busy. I think also that I stuffed up the episode count with future appearances and whatnot, I'll try to fix that up too. But yeah, they're all yours. Thanks! -- Tristan0709 talk 20:55, 30 September 2009 (EDT)
    • Your welcome! And I had left comments on the second link's talk page for what I wasn't sure about and stuff. Also, for Season Three and I guess Four now, are you counting the appearances for the characters who used to be main but not any more? (Like D.L. or Micah) ~~IHHTalk 20:58, 30 September 2009 (EDT)
      • Yeah, I was a bit confused at my own work there too. I think I'll only put characters if they are 'main' for that season or episode. So Elle and Adam shouldn't be in Season Three, and Micah shouldn't be in Volume Four. Otherwise we'd have to add Sylar and Ando for Season One and Angela for Season One and Two as well. Are you editing the article now? I don't want edit conflict, that's all. -- Tristan0709 talk 21:02, 30 September 2009 (EDT)
        • No, I'm not but that makes since and means that Nathan needs to be taken off of Volume Four right? So D.L.'s Season Two appearances need to be taken off. ~~IHHTalk 21:05, 30 September 2009 (EDT)
          • In fact, I think it would be better if we had any character who had ever been a regular for all seasons. Do you have MSN or AIM or something like that? -- Tristan0709 talk 21:06, 30 September 2009 (EDT)
            • No; sorry. But I guess I don't understand what you're saying? Like having the recurring characters on it? ~~IHHTalk 21:19, 30 September 2009 (EDT)
              • Well, I was thinking that it's probably good to note that those characters returned as guest stars later on and all. So perhaps we put their names in italics if they are not credited as a star? So that's be Noah for the first half of Season One, Sylar and Ando for Season One, Angela for Season One and Two, Adam for the first four episodes of Season Two and his appearances in Season Three, Elle for her appearances in Season Three, DL in Season Two and Micah in Season Three. Wow, that's a lot! So the order used in Season Four should now be used for all seasons, I think. You can see the names in hidden text if you go to edit now, do you think that looks a bit better than the (if they appear) part? -- Tristan0709 talk 21:25, 30 September 2009 (EDT)
                  • Oh yes! I like the (if you appear) better now! That looks good! The italics is good for after they aren't main but I don't think they should before they are main. And also, you aren't talking about doing all of the recurrings? (P.S. Dual has it's own thing, how can we fix that?)~~IHHTalk 21:37, 30 September 2009 (EDT)
                    • You don't think they should be before main? How about Ando who was in almost every episode of Season One, and so on? And tell me if the table looks too big if I leave space for all 24 characters like in Season One and Season Four. Umm, no, not al recurring characters, just main ones who used to be recurring. Not sure about Dual yet.... -- Tristan0709 talk 21:40, 30 September 2009 (EDT)
                      • Well I guess it doesn't look bad but I think we would take out Elle and Adam and all those that I assume are in the blank spaces. Also, the order would have to change. Because didn't you originally do the order of the people in which they appear? Because if so, then the orders would all be changed..~~IHHTalk 21:47, 30 September 2009 (EDT)
                        • The order i'm doing now is the order they appeared as regulars. It's hidden, at the top of the page. I think yeah, if a character doesn't appear all season (Samuel for 1-3, Monica for 1, 3-4), we won't have a box for them, But I still think appearances before becoming a regular should be there, if that's alright with you. Give me some time to add in the boxes and stuff, and tell me what you think. -- Tristan0709 talk 21:50, 30 September 2009 (EDT)
  • Ok, yeah that's fine! And Do you mean appeared as main? ~~IHHTalk 21:53, 30 September 2009 (EDT)
    • Yeah. Right now I think it is Peter, Simone, Mohinder, Niki, Micah, Claire, Nathan, Hiro, Isaac, DL, Noah, Maya, Ando, Sylar, Monica, Elle, Adam, Tracy, Angela, Samuel. -- Tristan0709 talk 21:55, 30 September 2009 (EDT)
      • Right, yeah what I had for Volume Five. And I don't know if you want to italicize Samuel since he isn't noted as main. Also, I don't know when Tracy and Angela was first a main characte!~ ~~IHHTalk 22:02, 30 September 2009 (EDT)
        • Tracy's always been main, Angela has been since The Second Coming, and yeah, I'll italicise Samuel. Have a look at Season One, what do you think? -- Tristan0709 talk 22:05, 30 September 2009 (EDT)
  • Seasons One and Two are finished, feel free to do what I did to them to Volume Three if you like. -- Tristan0709 talk 22:35, 30 September 2009 (EDT)
    • I think it looks good and I will when I get a chance!~~IHHTalk 07:00, 1 October 2009 (EDT)
    • Um, is there a reason Simone (in Unexpected) and Isaac (in .07%) are italicized? Those appearances are when they are main? Did you have it for when they died?~~IHHTalk 07:08, 1 October 2009 (EDT)
  • I just made a MSN, so you can contact me. My thing is ~~IHHTalk 20:36, 1 October 2009 (EDT)
      • The italics was probably something from when I first made the page that I forgot about. I changed a little bit for V5, instead of a Nahtna bar and a Sylar bar, there's a Sylar AP and a Sylar ZQ for the two actors. Thoughts? -- Tristan0709 talk 01:55, 2 October 2009 (EDT)
        • I think that's good but I'm not sure why you took out Simone, Isaac, and all them off of the Volume Five thing...~~IHHTalk 15:26, 2 October 2009 (EDT)
          • I just thought it would be more likely that they wouldn't appear than they would. If they appear (which I doubt), by all means, put their bars back. -- Tristan0709 talk 00:20, 3 October 2009 (EDT)
            • Ok, but Mohinder will definitaly(sp?) appear again, so I think his bar should still be there...~~IHHTalk 06:24, 3 October 2009 (EDT)
              • His bar is still there, under Peter, but he hasn't appeared yet so there's no reason for his name to be there, no? -- Tristan0709 talk 19:41, 3 October 2009 (EDT)
                • Oh, I see. So is the order still listed at the top? Or I guess I could go find out..~~IHHTalk 21:41, 3 October 2009 (EDT)
  • What are we gonna do about the new thing about 401a and 401b? ~~IHHTalk 17:38, 3 October 2009 (EDT)
    • I'm of the opinion they should be kept separate. - Tristan0709 talk 19:41, 3 October 2009 (EDT)
      • So, the appearance count staying the same?~~IHHTalk 21:41, 3 October 2009 (EDT)
        • I haven't changed the count at all on anything, not sure what it says. -- Tristan0709 talk 00:51, 4 October 2009 (EDT)

Re: Appearances page

It's okay, I tend to stay away from spoilers, unless it is a new episode name because I think that that is interesting! But its ok! we all make mistakes! You're welcome! ~~IHHTalk 12:40, 25 October 2009 (EDT)